Piktochart Team·
Updated on
October 11, 2024
Published on
October 4, 2024
Both Xara and GIMP are essential tools for businesses and designers. Xara enables quick, professional website creation without coding, while GIMP offers powerful, free image editing capabilities. We'll compare Xara and GIMP to determine which is superior in terms of ease of use, design flexibility, and feature set.
Xara offers a range of creative tools and solutions for web design, photo editing, graphic design, and content creation. They provide both cloud-based and desktop tools aimed at simplifying the design process for users of all skill levels.
Rated 9.3 for ease of use, Xara Web Designer+ is accessible for users without coding knowledge. The "Blocks" feature allows users to combine, style, and arrange pre-designed layouts easily, providing a level of design flexibility and control that is typically found in more complex design tools.
GIMP is a free and open-source image editor available across multiple platforms, including GNU/Linux, macOS, and Windows. It allows users to edit images, create original artwork, and produce graphic design elements.
One unique feature of GIMP is its extensive customization options through third-party plugins. Additionally, its free and open-source nature allows users to modify and distribute the source code, setting it apart from many competitors.
Both Xara and GIMP offer a range of features that cater to designers and creative professionals. Despite their differences, they share several key similarities that make them valuable tools for image editing and graphic design.
When comparing Xara and GIMP, the biggest differences in features become evident. While both tools cater to creative professionals, their unique offerings set them apart.
Xara's user interface is designed to be intuitive, featuring pre-designed blocks that can be easily combined and styled. This approach simplifies the design process, making it accessible for users without coding knowledge. The user experience is further enhanced by the availability of SEO-friendly settings and various integrations, which streamline the website creation process. Overall, Xara's usability is high, supported by extensive tutorials and resources that make it easy to learn and use.
GIMP, on the other hand, offers a feature-rich interface with extensive customization options through third-party plugins. While this provides flexibility, it can also make the interface appear cluttered and complex for new users. The user experience is tailored for graphic designers, photographers, and illustrators, offering high-quality photo manipulation tools and original artwork creation capabilities. GIMP's overall usability is bolstered by its open-source nature and community support, but it may require a steeper learning curve.
In terms of user interface and usability, Xara has a slight edge due to its simplicity and ease of use.
Collaboration in Xara is not prominently featured, but the tool does offer some hints at collaborative capabilities. The "Creative Collaboration" link in the footer suggests that there might be features to support teamwork, although these are not detailed on the main page. The focus remains on individual use, with an emphasis on ease of creating websites without coding.
GIMP, on the other hand, does not explicitly mention collaboration tools either. However, its integration with other software like Scribus and Inkscape can facilitate a collaborative workflow. The extensibility through scripts and plugins allows users to tailor the software to their specific needs, potentially supporting teamwork indirectly.
Neither Xara nor GIMP stands out as superior for collaboration based on the available information.
Xara offers a range of subscription plans, starting with a free plan and going up to $20 per month for the Scale Plan. The Designer Pro+ plan, which includes desktop publishing, web design, photo-editing, and graphic design, costs $16 per month when billed annually. Discounts are available for annual plans, bulk purchases, and specific customer groups.
GIMP, on the other hand, is entirely free and open-source, with no subscription plans or one-time purchase options. Users can donate to support the project, but there are no costs associated with using the software. This makes GIMP a cost-effective choice for those looking for powerful image editing tools without a financial commitment.
Overall, GIMP offers better pricing as it is free to use, while Xara requires a subscription for its advanced features.
Piktochart transforms complex ideas into captivating visuals that inform and engage your audience. With Piktochart AI, you can create stunning infographics, reports, and presentations in seconds, perfectly aligned with your brand. No design experience required.
Overall, users have given Xara a rating of 4.8 out of 5. While many appreciate its ease of use and customizability, some find the platform laggy and the upfront payment pricey.
Find more of Xara reviews on G2!
Overall, users have given GIMP a rating of 4.3 out of 5. While many appreciate its free services and photo editing capabilities, some find the learning curve and limited features frustrating.
Find more of GIMP reviews on G2!
Our users have given Piktochart an overall rating of 4.4 out of 5. They appreciate its ease of use, variety of templates, and drag-and-drop functionality. Here are some of the sentiments from our customers:
Find more of our reviews on G2!
Why Choose Xara:
Why Choose GIMP:
Why Choose Piktochart:
Whether you're a small business owner, a graphic designer, or a marketing professional, Xara, GIMP, and Piktochart each offer unique strengths to meet your needs. While all three tools are excellent choices, we believe Piktochart stands out for its ease of use, variety of templates, and ability to create stunning visuals quickly. Give Piktochart a try and see how it can transform your complex ideas into captivating visuals effortlessly.
The latest industry news, interviews, technologies, and resources.
