Piktochart Team·
Updated on
October 11, 2024
Published on
September 25, 2024
Krita and Photopea are essential tools for businesses and designers, offering professional-grade features without the hefty price tag. We'll compare Krita and Photopea to determine which one best meets the needs of creative professionals and businesses alike.
Krita is a professional free and open-source painting program created by artists to provide affordable art tools for everyone. It is a public project licensed under GNU GPL and is owned by its contributors.
Krita offers multiple brush types for different art styles and includes layers, drawing assistants, and stabilizers. Its commitment to being free and open-source, along with extensive community involvement, sets it apart from many competitors.
Photopea offers a free online photo editor that provides professional-grade tools for photo editing directly in the browser. It eliminates the need for downloads and installations, making it a convenient and accessible option for users.
Photopea runs fully locally on the user's device, ensuring files open instantly and never leave the user's device. It also supports a wide range of file formats, including full PSD support, and features advanced AI capabilities for tasks like background removal and content replacement.
Both Krita and Photopea are powerful tools for creative professionals, offering a range of features that cater to artists and designers alike. Despite their different platforms, they share several key functionalities that make them versatile and effective.
While both Krita and Photopea offer robust tools for creative professionals, their feature sets cater to different needs. Here are the key differences:
Krita's user interface is feature-rich, offering multiple brush types, layers, and drawing aids. However, its complexity can be overwhelming for new users. The user experience is enhanced by a supportive community and extensive resources, but the learning curve remains steep. Overall usability is high for experienced artists, but beginners may struggle with its depth and complexity.
Photopea's interface is accessible directly from the browser, requiring no downloads. This convenience is a significant advantage, but the interface can feel cluttered. The user experience is streamlined by its local operation and advanced AI tools, yet it may lack the depth some professionals seek. Usability is strong for quick edits, but less so for intricate projects.
Neither company has a clear advantage in user interface and usability; it depends on the user's needs and experience level.
Collaboration in Krita is primarily facilitated through its supportive community, where artists can share their work and receive feedback. However, it lacks real-time collaboration tools, making teamwork more asynchronous. The ability to share artwork and get feedback supports teamwork, but the absence of simultaneous editing features can be a limitation for teams needing immediate collaborative capabilities.
Photopea, on the other hand, does not explicitly mention any features that facilitate direct collaboration. Its focus is on individual use, with no real-time collaboration tools or cloud-based sharing options. The local operation of Photopea may limit collaborative efforts, as it does not support multiple users working on the same project simultaneously.
Neither company offers a clear advantage for collaboration; it depends on the user's specific needs and workflow preferences.
Krita is a free and open-source application, relying on donations for support. Users can contribute through monthly or one-time donations, but there are no mandatory costs associated with using the software. This makes Krita accessible to everyone, regardless of their financial situation.
Photopea offers a free account with basic features and a Premium account for ad-free usage and additional benefits. The Premium account requires a one-time payment, though specific prices are not detailed. For larger needs, a self-hosted version costs between $500 and $2000 per month, paid annually.
Overall, Krita's donation-based model provides a more flexible and cost-effective option for users compared to Photopea's structured pricing tiers.
Piktochart transforms complex ideas into captivating visuals that inform and engage your audience. With Piktochart AI, you can create stunning infographics, reports, and presentations in seconds, perfectly aligned with your brand. No design experience required.
Overall, users have given Krita a rating of 4.4 out of 5. While they appreciate its free and open-source nature, they find the user interface outdated and experience issues with saving documents.
Find more of Krita reviews on G2!
Photopea has received an overall rating of 4.8 out of 5. Users appreciate its free services and ease of use but find it expensive and limited in features. Here are some reviews:
Find more of Photopea reviews on G2!
Our users have given Piktochart an overall rating of 4.4 out of 5. They find it incredibly useful for creating professional presentations and graphics with ease. Here are some of their thoughts:
Find more of our reviews on G2!
Why a consumer might want to use Krita over Photopea:
Why a consumer might want to use Photopea over Krita:
Why a consumer might want to use Piktochart over Photopea and Krita:
Whether you're a digital artist, a photo editing enthusiast, or a professional needing stunning visuals, Krita, Photopea, and Piktochart each offer unique strengths. While all three tools are excellent choices, we believe Piktochart stands out for its ease of use, AI-powered design capabilities, and versatility across various industries. Give Piktochart a try and see how effortlessly you can transform your ideas into captivating visuals.
The latest industry news, interviews, technologies, and resources.
