Piktochart Team·
Updated on
October 11, 2024
Published on
October 4, 2024
Adobe Photoshop and Photopea are essential tools for businesses and designers, offering advanced features and professional-grade editing capabilities. We'll compare Adobe Photoshop and Photopea to determine which one best meets your needs, focusing on aspects like cost, accessibility, and feature set.
Adobe is a software company known for its creative and design solutions. The company offers a range of products and services under Adobe Creative Cloud, including applications for photography, graphic design, video editing, illustration, 3D & AR, and PDF management.
Adobe Photoshop offers intuitive tools to replace backgrounds and merge multiple images to create unique composites. Its integration of generative AI features, such as Generative Fill and Generative Expand, allows users to make complex edits quickly and with greater control.
Photopea provides a free, online photo editing tool that operates directly in the browser. It offers professional-grade editing features without the need for downloads or installations, making it accessible and convenient for a wide range of users.
Photopea's fully local operation means no need to upload files; everything runs on the user's device. This unique feature enhances privacy and security, setting it apart from competitors.
Adobe Photoshop and Photopea share a range of features that make them both powerful tools for image editing and graphic design. Here are the most significant similarities:
Adobe Photoshop and Photopea each offer unique features that cater to different user needs. Here are the most significant differences:
Adobe Photoshop's user interface is complex, with a steep learning curve due to its extensive features and tools. The software's layout is dense, requiring users to navigate through multiple menus and panels. This can be overwhelming for beginners, though it offers depth for advanced users. The user experience is tailored for professional use, with powerful tools that demand a significant time investment to master. Overall, the usability of Photoshop is high for those familiar with its interface but can be daunting for new users.
Photopea, on the other hand, offers a more straightforward user interface that is accessible directly through a web browser. Its layout is simpler, making it easier for users to find and use the tools they need. The user experience is designed to be intuitive, with a focus on ease of use and quick access to features. This makes Photopea more approachable for casual users and those who need to perform quick edits without extensive training. Overall, Photopea's usability is more user-friendly for beginners and those seeking a hassle-free editing experience.
Photopea has a better user interface and usability for casual and beginner users.
Adobe Photoshop does not explicitly highlight features that facilitate collaboration. The software lacks built-in tools for real-time editing or cloud-based sharing, making it less convenient for team projects. Users must rely on external platforms for collaborative work, which can be cumbersome and time-consuming.
Photopea, similarly, does not emphasize collaboration features. Operating entirely in the browser, it does not offer real-time editing or cloud-based sharing options. Users looking to collaborate will need to find alternative methods to share and edit files together.
Neither Adobe Photoshop nor Photopea stands out as superior for collaboration.
Adobe Photoshop offers various subscription plans, including a standalone option at NIS 81.00 per month or NIS 924.00 per year. The Photography Plan, which includes Lightroom, costs NIS 70.00 per month. For those needing more, the Creative Cloud All Apps plan is available at NIS 205.00 per month or NIS 2,280.00 per year.
Photopea provides a free account and a Premium account, though specific pricing for the Premium account isn't mentioned. The Self-Hosted Version ranges from $500 to $2000 per month, paid annually. Photopea's free access and flexible pricing options make it more cost-effective for casual users compared to Adobe Photoshop.
Piktochart transforms complex ideas into captivating visuals that inform and engage your audience. With Piktochart AI, you can create stunning infographics, reports, and presentations in seconds, perfectly aligned with your brand. No design experience required.
Overall, users have given Adobe Photoshop a rating of 4.6 out of 5. While many appreciate its powerful tools and features, frustrations include its steep learning curve and high cost.
Find more of Adobe Photoshop reviews on G2!
Overall, users have given Photopea a rating of 4.8 out of 5. While many appreciate its free services and ease of use, frustrations include limited features and upload issues.
Find more of Photopea reviews on G2!
Our users have given Piktochart an overall rating of 4.4 out of 5. They appreciate its ease of use, variety of templates, and comprehensive toolset. Here are some of their thoughts:
Find more of our reviews on G2!
Why Choose Adobe Photoshop:
Why Choose Photopea:
Why Choose Piktochart:
Whether you're a professional designer, a casual user, or someone in between, Adobe Photoshop, Photopea, and Piktochart each offer unique strengths to meet your needs. However, if you're looking for an intuitive, all-in-one tool that simplifies the creation of stunning visuals, we recommend giving Piktochart a try. With its user-friendly interface and diverse templates, you'll be creating captivating content in no time.
The latest industry news, interviews, technologies, and resources.
